|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Summary of Workshops and Cross Cutting Issues in the Working Groups
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Congratulations for another successful meeting
- Reactivation of AORTIC, initiated in 2000 in San Francisco, continues
on course
- A few comments about this meeting may be of value for the ones to follow
|
|
18
|
- Venue: Excellent
- Hotel facilities: Close to perfect
- Hospitality: Excellent
- Academic Program: Fabulous
- Rapporteurs’ role: needs improvement
- Security: Good
- Networking Opportunities: Extraordinary
|
|
19
|
- Organization: Could be better
- Difficulty with assignment of meeting rooms
- Secretarial facilities: inadequate
- Business centre facilities are very good
- Meals: Timing of lunch: could have been more internationalized
- Touring opportunities: Deficient
|
|
20
|
- A Very Successful Meeting
- AORTIC and Meeting Organizers have every reason to be proud
|
|
21
|
- Disproportionately excessive mortality risks in women of African
ancestry
- Heterogenous disease: subclassification now possible on the basis of ER
status, Her-2 status
- DNA microarray analysis identifying Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-cell
types, differential p53 expression
- P53+/Her-2+/ER- disease: A>AA>CA
- contribute to the biological
behavior of the disease
- Africa likely to help the international community in resolving the
problem of breast cancer
|
|
22
|
- Unique sequences with 90%-98% homology to env gene of MMTV identified by
PCR in human br.ca. tissue:
- Named HMTV
- Serological evidence of its association in 38% USA; 60%-75% in West
Africa, 1%-10% in China, Japan, and Vietnam
- Suggestion: Most br. cancers in Africa caused by an infections agent
carried by house mice.
|
|
23
|
- Risk factors -> family history and race
- Incidence/mortality 34%/123% higher in AA vs CA
- Disparity in outcome likely the result of complex gene-environment
interaction
- Relatively little information available worldwide to predict outcomes
- Research opportunity for AORTIC
|
|
24
|
- Prostate Genetics Research in Senegal (PROGRÉS) Study
- Aim: To understand the factors that could explain the nature of CaP in
Senegal
- Variation by ethnicity in the frequency of certain high-risk genes
(CYP3A4 and SRD5A2 – [testosterone metabolism]) -> SEN>AA>CA
- Dietary history of SEN being evaluated by questionnaire
|
|
25
|
- With the possible exception of cancer of the uterine cervix, cancer
screening in Africa appears to be controversial
- Lack of treatment facilities
- There appears to be consensus that methodologies for early detection
should be promoted
|
|
26
|
- New knowledge of breast ca. biology translating to novel treatment
approaches
- Trial of Capecitabine (Xeloda) plus Trastuzumab (Herceptin) à ÎÎ of Her-2/neu overexpression in br.ca case
of A/AA women
- Neoadjuvant approach to locally advanced/inflammatory breast ca. may
allow for rapid testing of novel agents and treatment tailoring
- New opportunity for collaboration for AORTIC
|
|
27
|
- Through Its Program of Action for Cancer Therapy (PACT), IAEA:
- Has since 1974 spent $180+ for 170 projects in developing countries
- Today: $12 million/year for cancer therapy projects
- Tomorrow: Needs at least 10 times this much to meet spiraling demand
- 2006-07 Focus: Tanzania Pilot
|
|
28
|
- AORTIC should collaborate with the IAEA
as an “anchor to build the ship” of populating Africa with much
needed radiotherapy units
- AORTIC should work together with IAEA, IACR, ACS, UICC, WHO, and others
to define an irresistible funding proposal to place cancer on the global
health agenda – and save millions of lives and ameliorate suffering.
|
|
29
|
- Strategic use of power, persuasion and people to achieve positive change
in government policies related to cancer
- Example: Mary Woodard Lasker, the Nixon Presidency and the “War Against
Cancer”
- Main instrument for change by ACS
- Global and African cancer burden is intolerable and will only get worse
without effective advocacy
- Need to mobilize African nation for change to influence the morbidity
and mortality of cancer in the region.
|
|
30
|
- AORTIC should ensure that African people SPEAK WITH ONE VOICE when it
comes to speaking for cancer control
|
|
31
|
- Make AORTIC more visible to enhance its capacity to influence policy on
cancer care, attract funding for training and research
- Set advocacy goals for education and awareness programs towards
prevention and early cancer detection
- Activate political support through the African Union (AU) and establish
within this body a cancer specific mechanism
- Build linkages with health training institutions and major umbrella
colleges, e.g. CPS, Medical and Nursing Schools
|
|
32
|
- 5. Network with major cancer organizations worldwide
- 6. Advocate the creation of AU Cancer Awareness Day
- 7. Promote a “Cancer Walk Day”, facilitated by prominent cancer
survivors
- 8. Stimulate activities, such as:
- Anti-tobacco award winning essay competition
- Grants for research students for MPhil, MMed, and PhD
- Grants for medical and nursing students in the area of prevention and
palliative care
|
|
33
|
- 9. Establish a Scientific Advisory Committee
- 10. Establish an African Cancer Society as an umbrella for national
cancer societies
- 11. Develop an AORTIC Advocacy Policy
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- It has been a tremendously exciting four days
- Our bilingual collaboration at this meeting is a far cry from the
experience of 22 years ago, when AORTIC was almost a stillborn because
of language differences.
- Je suis absolutement comment!
- AORTIC is on the move
- Please, let us keep the momentum
|